The flesh endures the storms of the present alone; the mind, those of the past and future as well as the present. Gluttony is a lust of the mind.

The flesh endures the storms of
The flesh endures the storms of
The flesh endures the storms of the present alone; the mind, those of the past and future as well as the present. Gluttony is a lust of the mind.
The flesh endures the storms of
The flesh endures the storms of the present alone; the mind, those of the past and future as well as the present. Gluttony is a lust of the mind.
The flesh endures the storms of
The flesh endures the storms of the present alone; the mind, those of the past and future as well as the present. Gluttony is a lust of the mind.
The flesh endures the storms of
The flesh endures the storms of the present alone; the mind, those of the past and future as well as the present. Gluttony is a lust of the mind.
The flesh endures the storms of
The flesh endures the storms of the present alone; the mind, those of the past and future as well as the present. Gluttony is a lust of the mind.
The flesh endures the storms of
The flesh endures the storms of
The flesh endures the storms of
The flesh endures the storms of
The flesh endures the storms of
The flesh endures the storms of

In this quote, Thomas Hobbes reflects on the nature of human suffering and desire, particularly in the context of gluttony and the mind. He suggests that the flesh—our physical body—can only endure the immediate challenges of the present, such as hunger, fatigue, or pain. In contrast, the mind is capable of experiencing not only the difficulties of the present but also the emotional burdens of the past and future. This indicates that while the body is rooted in the now, the mind can often dwell on past regrets or anxieties about what is to come, creating a deeper, more complex kind of suffering.

Hobbes also introduces the idea that gluttony—the overindulgence in food or drink—is not merely a physical excess but a lust of the mind. He implies that gluttony arises from a mental or emotional desire, rather than just a bodily craving. The quote suggests that indulgence in excess is driven by psychological forces, such as the need to satisfy deeper desires, soothe anxiety, or fill emotional voids. Gluttony, in Hobbes’ view, is a manifestation of the mind’s inability to find contentment or balance, leading to an overemphasis on immediate gratification.

By stating that gluttony is a lust of the mind, Hobbes emphasizes that human desires are not always grounded in physical needs but are often influenced by psychological factors like greed, boredom, or the search for comfort. This reflects Hobbes' broader philosophy that human beings are driven by self-interest and the desire to avoid discomfort, which can lead them to overindulge or act irrationally in their pursuit of pleasure.

Ultimately, Hobbes' quote serves as a reminder that human suffering is not only rooted in the physical world but is deeply intertwined with our mental and emotional states. It encourages us to recognize the role of the mind in shaping our behaviors and urges awareness of how gluttony and other desires can stem from deeper psychological needs, rather than mere physical want.

Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes

English - Philosopher April 5, 1588 - December 4, 1679

Have 5 Comment The flesh endures the storms of

TLDuy Tien Le

This quote makes me think about how we tend to blame our bodies for weakness or excess, when perhaps the root lies in our thoughts. Is Hobbes arguing that desire, especially destructive desire, starts as a mental construct rather than a physical craving? If so, that’s a powerful argument for introspection and self-awareness. Can controlling our thoughts lead to greater mastery over our actions and impulses?

Reply.
Information sender

MLminh ly

There’s something almost haunting about the idea that the body is stuck in the ‘now,’ while the mind is spread thin across all of time. It makes me question whether physical suffering is actually easier to bear than mental anguish. And the part about gluttony—does it imply that overindulgence isn’t about the senses at all, but about something internal we’re trying to fill or escape from? That’s a pretty profound reframe.

Reply.
Information sender

TDPhuong Thao Dethw

This perspective seems rooted in a very Hobbesian worldview—pessimistic, but incredibly insightful. I wonder, though, does this mean the mind is our greatest gift or our greatest curse? It allows us to anticipate and remember, but that also means we never fully escape suffering. How do we cultivate mental peace if our thoughts constantly stretch across past trauma and future anxiety? Is mindfulness the answer, or something deeper?

Reply.
Information sender

AHTuan Anh Ho

I find the final line especially fascinating: gluttony as a 'lust of the mind' rather than a failure of the body. It flips the usual narrative. Is Hobbes saying our compulsions are more about imagination and desire than actual need? That opens up questions about addiction, consumption, and even modern marketing. How much of our overindulgence is driven by psychological hunger rather than physical necessity?

Reply.
Information sender

NNNguyet Nguyen

This quote really intrigues me—it makes a sharp distinction between physical and mental suffering. Do you think Hobbes is suggesting that the mind is actually more burdened than the body because it can’t escape time? If so, that’s a pretty bleak view of consciousness. But I also find it oddly accurate—how often do we torment ourselves with regrets or fears that have nothing to do with our present moment?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender
0.36413 sec| 2585.266 kb