The world in general doesn't know what to make of originality; it is startled out of its comfortable habits of thought, and its first reaction is one of anger.
W. Somerset Maugham's quote highlights the challenging nature of originality in a world that prefers familiarity. He suggests that when something original appears, it disrupts the established norms and comforts people have built for themselves over time. The phrase "startled out of its comfortable habits of thought" conveys how new and innovative ideas can be unsettling to those who are accustomed to conventional thinking and established patterns.
The anger that Maugham refers to is a natural human response to the unfamiliar. Originality, in this context, is viewed as a threat to the status quo, and people's initial reaction to it is often defensive. This anger comes from a place of discomfort, as individuals are faced with an idea or creation that challenges their deeply ingrained beliefs or understanding of the world.
Maugham's observation suggests that society often resists originality because it demands a shift in perspective. The quote also implies that true innovation is rarely accepted without struggle, as it forces people to question what they know and embrace uncertainty. This resistance to change is not always conscious, but it is a common pattern in human behavior when confronted with the new and unfamiliar.
Ultimately, Maugham's quote reveals the paradox that originality can be both an exciting force for change and a disruptive, sometimes unwelcome presence. It challenges the complacency of the world and, in turn, invites anger as a natural, though often misplaced, reaction to progress and innovation.
TBThuy Bui
I appreciate how this quote highlights a universal challenge but also raises a question: Should originality always be pursued despite the initial anger it sparks? Are there times when resisting originality serves a protective or beneficial purpose? It makes me think about the delicate balance between honoring tradition and embracing change, and how that balance shapes progress.
TNNguyen Phan Thien Nhan
This statement prompts me to think about the role of originality in different fields—art, science, politics—and how reactions to it might vary. Are some domains more welcoming of originality, or is anger a universal response? I also wonder how much social context influences whether originality is seen as a threat or an opportunity. Could fostering diverse communities help ease this tension?
SHSa Huyen
Reading this, I’m curious about the psychological mechanisms behind the anger that originality provokes. Is it a defense mechanism to protect one's worldview, or something deeper rooted in fear of change? How do individuals overcome this instinctive anger to embrace new ideas? It would be interesting to explore strategies people use to manage discomfort and grow through exposure to originality.
HNHuy Nguyen
I find this perspective both insightful and a bit disheartening. If originality is met with anger, how can true innovation thrive? Are there historical examples where initial hostility gave way to acceptance? This makes me question whether our current cultural climate is more or less tolerant of originality compared to the past, especially in an era of rapid technological and social change.
TNTruc Nha
This quote captures the often uncomfortable reality faced by innovators and creators. It makes me wonder why originality triggers anger rather than curiosity or admiration. Is it because new ideas threaten established norms and challenge people's sense of security? I’d love to hear thoughts on how society can better cultivate openness to originality, and whether education plays a role in reducing fear and resistance.