The first poems I knew were nursery rhymes, and before I could read them for myself, I had come to love just the words of them, the words alone.

The first poems I knew were
The first poems I knew were
The first poems I knew were nursery rhymes, and before I could read them for myself, I had come to love just the words of them, the words alone.
The first poems I knew were
The first poems I knew were nursery rhymes, and before I could read them for myself, I had come to love just the words of them, the words alone.
The first poems I knew were
The first poems I knew were nursery rhymes, and before I could read them for myself, I had come to love just the words of them, the words alone.
The first poems I knew were
The first poems I knew were nursery rhymes, and before I could read them for myself, I had come to love just the words of them, the words alone.
The first poems I knew were
The first poems I knew were nursery rhymes, and before I could read them for myself, I had come to love just the words of them, the words alone.
The first poems I knew were
The first poems I knew were
The first poems I knew were
The first poems I knew were
The first poems I knew were
The first poems I knew were

The quote "The first poems I knew were nursery rhymes, and before I could read them for myself, I had come to love just the words of them, the words alone" by Dylan Thomas reflects the early, formative experiences with language and poetry that shaped his love for words. Thomas, a Welsh poet known for his lyrical and evocative writing, speaks to the powerful connection he developed with the sound and rhythm of language before fully understanding its meaning. For him, the beauty of poetry existed not just in its content but in the musicality and aesthetic quality of the words themselves.

Thomas' reflection highlights how nursery rhymes, with their repetitive and melodic structure, introduced him to the joy of language before he had the ability to read or comprehend their deeper meanings. The emphasis on loving the words alone suggests that Thomas was drawn to the sensory experience of language—the way the words sounded, how they flowed together, and how they resonated emotionally. This speaks to the idea that language and poetry can captivate us at a very early age, not just through meaning, but through the sound and feel of the words.

This connection to words as a child paved the way for Thomas' later development as a poet. His ability to appreciate the aesthetic qualities of language helped him craft poetry that was deeply rich in sound and rhythm, often making his works feel as much about the experience of listening as about the intellectual engagement with their meaning. By highlighting his love for the words themselves, Thomas underscores the sensory and emotional power of poetry that goes beyond simply understanding its meaning.

Ultimately, Thomas’ words remind us of the early and innate connection people have with language, especially in childhood. The enjoyment of poetry isn’t always about understanding its deeper meanings, but can also be about the simple pleasure of how the words sound and feel, something Thomas experienced long before he could read them himself.

Dylan Thomas
Dylan Thomas

Welsh - Poet October 27, 1914 - November 9, 1953

Have 6 Comment The first poems I knew were

THLu Thi Thu Hue

I find this deeply moving. It raises the question: what happens to that primal connection to language as we grow up? Does literacy paradoxically make us more distant from the musicality of language because we become so fixated on meaning? I wonder if truly great poets retain that childlike ear for words and let sound guide sense, rather than the other way around.

Reply.
Information sender

RMRK MSMR

This quote reminds me how foundational oral tradition is. Before reading, we listen. And Thomas seems to say that our earliest experiences with language are sensory and emotional, not intellectual. I’m curious—does this explain why we sometimes feel connected to poetry even when we don’t fully understand it? Could the cadence and tone alone be enough to stir something deep within us?

Reply.
Information sender

HPnguyen huy phuc

There’s something almost sacred about how Thomas describes his early relationship with language. It makes me wonder—do we underestimate the poetic sensibilities of children? If a child can fall in love with words just by hearing them, maybe that suggests that poetry isn’t about understanding at all, but feeling. Could this be why some of the most enduring poetry is rhythmic, playful, and musical?

Reply.
Information sender

TTNguyen thanh thu truc

Dylan Thomas captures something so pure and honest here. But it makes me question—can this early love for the music of words be nurtured or is it innate? And if it’s so foundational, how can educators and parents protect it from being dulled by rote learning and technical grammar rules? I’d love to hear how others found their way back to the joy of language after schooling made it feel mechanical.

Reply.
Information sender

VDLe Van Dung

What fascinates me here is the idea of loving language for its texture, not its meaning. It makes me think—have we lost that childlike wonder as adults, always focused on interpretation and analysis? Maybe we over-intellectualize poetry now. I’d love to know if poets and readers alike could benefit from returning to that more instinctual appreciation of words as pure sound and emotional resonance.

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender
0.32063 sec| 2577.75 kb