Proponents of same-sex marriage regularly label opponents 'radical' and 'extremist.' However, given that no society in thousands of years has allowed same-sex marriage, it is, by definition, the proponents of same-sex marriage whose position is radical and extreme.

In this quote, Dennis Prager, a conservative commentator and writer, argues that the proponents of same-sex marriage are the ones holding the radical and extreme position. He counters the typical narrative that those who oppose same-sex marriage are the outliers, labeling them as radicals or extremists. Prager points out that for thousands of years, no society has recognized or allowed same-sex marriage, implying that it is actually the shift toward recognizing such unions that is historically unprecedented and, therefore, "radical."

Prager’s argument is based on the idea that tradition and historical precedent should be key in determining what is considered acceptable in society. By emphasizing that no society has allowed same-sex marriage for such a long period, he suggests that the movement for it represents a significant departure from cultural norms and social structures that have been in place for centuries. In his view, advocating for a change to such a foundational institution as marriage makes the pro-same-sex marriage stance the more extreme of the two.

This perspective is rooted in a conservative understanding of social change, which often prioritizes the preservation of long-standing institutions and traditions. Prager challenges the more progressive viewpoint that marriage equality is a natural extension of civil rights and societal evolution, instead framing it as an unprecedented shift that disregards the wisdom of history.

Ultimately, Prager’s quote serves as a counterargument to the growing movement for same-sex marriage, positioning it as a radical change rather than an extension of human rights. His view reflects a broader ideological divide over issues like marriage equality, with conservatives typically placing a higher value on tradition and stability, while progressives advocate for change based on the principles of equality and justice.