It is statistically proven that the strongest institution that guarantees procreation and continuity of the generations is marriage between one man and one woman. We don't want genocide. We don't want to destroy the sacred institution of marriage.

The quote by Alveda King reflects her strong stance on the traditional definition of marriage and its perceived societal importance. She asserts that it is statistically proven that the most reliable institution for ensuring procreation and the continuity of generations is a marriage between one man and one woman. King frames marriage not merely as a personal or cultural preference but as a fundamental social institution with far-reaching implications for society’s stability and survival.

King’s reference to genocide is rhetorical, emphasizing the stakes she associates with altering the traditional concept of marriage. By suggesting that redefining marriage could destroy the sacred institution, she positions same-sex marriage as a threat to what she considers the foundational building blocks of society. Her choice of words underscores a moral and existential urgency, framing marriage as more than a legal or social contract—it is a sacred duty with implications for the continuation of families and communities.

The origin of this quote lies in Alveda King’s work as a social conservative activist and niece of Martin Luther King Jr. She has been a vocal advocate for pro-life causes and traditional family values, often linking moral, social, and demographic arguments to her political activism. In the context of debates over same-sex marriage in the United States, King’s comments reflect a broader conservative discourse emphasizing the biological and cultural importance of traditional marriage structures.

Overall, the quote highlights King’s belief in the primacy of heterosexual marriage for societal continuity and moral stability. By invoking both statistics and moral language, she seeks to justify her position as grounded in both empirical reasoning and ethical responsibility, framing the debate over marriage as a critical issue for the survival and well-being of society.