No murder or sin or act of barbarism or cruelty has ever been committed by a person fully absorbed in the reading of a book. By this fact alone, we can conclude that readers are nicer people, at least until they put the book down. When we are reading, we are better.
In this quote, Anthony McCarten, a New Zealand author and screenwriter, suggests that the act of reading has a profound and positive impact on a person's character. He argues that no act of murder, sin, barbarism, or cruelty has ever been committed by someone who is fully absorbed in a book. This implies that reading—particularly when deeply engaged with—encourages empathy, calmness, and a sense of moral responsibility, making readers "better" people while they are immersed in their reading.
McCarten’s statement highlights the transformative power of books and literature. By engaging with stories and ideas, individuals can temporarily distance themselves from negative emotions or harmful impulses, leading them to be more compassionate and understanding. He suggests that the act of reading promotes a sense of goodness in people, making them more inclined to engage in thoughtful and peaceful reflection rather than harmful actions.
The origin of this quote lies in McCarten’s understanding of the human condition and his belief in the benefits of literature. As an author, he has likely observed how reading can inspire individuals to consider different perspectives, leading to increased empathy and personal growth. This insight is also reflected in his works, where the exploration of human emotions and conflicts is often a central theme.
In essence, McCarten’s quote underscores the idea that literature has the power to elevate people’s behavior, at least temporarily, by fostering empathy and reflection. It suggests that while we are engaged in reading, we are more likely to be calm, thoughtful, and kind, showing the positive influence that books can have on a person's moral and emotional state.
PLNguyen Phuong Lan
The playful tone here invites reflection on the power of literature to shape human behavior. Do you think the ‘better’ state while reading is universal, or do some readers remain unaffected? How might reading in groups or discussing books amplify or challenge this effect? It would be fascinating to consider how communal reading experiences impact empathy and kindness.
NOL A I N O
Anthony McCarten’s statement raises a question about the role of books in personal growth. Is the act of reading enough to make someone ‘better,’ or is it what we do with the knowledge afterward that counts? How do different types of literature—fiction, non-fiction, philosophy—affect our character and actions differently?
NTNguyen Thao
This quote made me think about how reading creates a temporary escape from reality. Could this immersion also serve as a form of meditation or emotional regulation? If so, how might encouraging more reading help reduce societal violence or stress? On the flip side, does reliance on books as an escape risk avoiding real-world problems?
NNNhung Nhung
I love the idea that reading is a peaceful, absorbing act that prevents cruelty. But does this mean that those who don’t read are more prone to bad behavior? That seems like an oversimplification. How do other factors like environment, education, and personality interact with reading habits to shape morality? It would be interesting to explore the relationship between literacy and ethics more deeply.
TTLo Thi Tinh
This quote humorously suggests readers are ‘nicer people,’ but I’m curious about the broader implications. Does reading inherently promote kindness, or is it more about the distraction from negative actions? Can books also inspire dark thoughts or justify harmful acts? How might different genres or themes influence the reader’s mindset and behavior during and after reading?