The belief that the law will never 'catch up' to technology is borne in part of tech exceptionalism, a libertarian elitism that derides any kind of legal or regulatory impediment as Luddism.

In this quote, Sarah Jeong critiques the idea that the law will never be able to keep pace with the rapid development of technology. She attributes this belief to tech exceptionalism, a mindset that places technology above all other societal concerns, assuming that innovation should be free from regulation or legal constraints. Jeong argues that this perspective often stems from a libertarian elitism, where a select group of tech industry leaders view any form of legal or regulatory oversight as an obstacle to progress, often dismissing such regulation as Luddism.

The term Luddism refers to a historical movement in the early 19th century where workers, fearing the loss of jobs to machines, protested technological advancements. By invoking this term, Jeong suggests that the attitude of those who resist regulation is dismissive of the broader societal implications of technology and its effects on issues like privacy, security, and labor. The use of Luddism here is meant to emphasize that opposition to regulation is often framed as a rejection of progress, even when such regulation might be necessary to ensure fairness and public well-being.

Jeong’s critique highlights the tension between technological innovation and legal frameworks. She challenges the prevailing belief within the tech industry that laws should not constrain technological advancements, arguing that such a viewpoint ignores the need for a balanced approach where innovation is coupled with ethical considerations and societal protections. This critique suggests that a disregard for legal oversight can lead to inequality, exploitation, and a lack of accountability in the face of powerful tech companies.

Ultimately, Jeong’s quote calls for a reevaluation of tech exceptionalism and a more thoughtful integration of technology and law. She advocates for regulations that adapt to new technologies in a way that ensures they are used responsibly, without dismissing the need for legal frameworks that safeguard public interests.