Yes, the state must intervene to prevent the exploitation of poor Indian women who are enticed or coerced into surrogacy, as well as to protect the rights of surrogate children. However, it should also be empathetic to individuals with alternative lifestyles who are well within their legal and human rights to demand access to surrogacy services.

In this quote, Kapil Sibal emphasizes the need for a balanced approach when it comes to regulating surrogacy in India. He acknowledges that the state must intervene to prevent the exploitation of poor Indian women who may be coerced or enticed into becoming surrogates under exploitative conditions. At the same time, Sibal argues that the state should show empathy towards individuals with alternative lifestyles, such as same-sex couples or single individuals, who also have the legal and human rights to access surrogacy services.

The origin of this quote comes from Sibal’s role as a prominent Indian lawyer and politician, known for advocating for social justice and human rights. Sibal's statement reflects his understanding of the complex issues surrounding surrogacy in India, particularly given the country’s position as a global hub for commercial surrogacy. His perspective suggests that the government should address surrogacy exploitation while also ensuring that it does not infringe on the rights of individuals who wish to pursue surrogacy within legal and ethical bounds.

Sibal’s call for empathy highlights the need for a legal framework that balances the protection of vulnerable women with the recognition of the rights of intended parents. By addressing the exploitation of surrogates while also acknowledging the rights of those seeking surrogacy, he advocates for a comprehensive and just approach to surrogacy laws that respects the rights of both the surrogates and the intended parents, regardless of their lifestyle choices.

Ultimately, Sibal’s quote calls for nuanced regulation in the area of surrogacy, aiming to protect human rights while preventing exploitation. It reflects his broader philosophy of ensuring that legal systems are equitable, empathetic, and inclusive, balancing the need for protection with the rights of individuals to access services like surrogacy, which should be governed by ethical and legal standards that serve everyone’s best interests.