The doctrine of marriage depends on Genesis being true. If there's an absolute authority, and if God's the Creator, He made one man and one woman. Jesus came and said that marriage is between a man and woman. If Genesis is not true, we're just animals, and marriage is just whatever you want to make it to be.

Ken Ham’s quote asserts that the doctrine of marriage is inherently tied to his interpretation of the Bible, specifically the Book of Genesis. Ham argues that if the story of creation in Genesis is true, then marriage is a divinely ordained institution, designed by God as the union between one man and one woman. For Ham, the Bible serves as the ultimate authority, and any deviation from this framework undermines the very foundation of marriage, reducing it to a subjective or fluid concept. He implies that without a belief in Genesis, human beings are just like any other animals, and marriage becomes a matter of personal preference rather than a sacred institution.

The origin of this quote comes from Ken Ham’s role as a prominent Christian fundamentalist and creationist, best known for founding the Creation Museum and the Ark Encounter, which advocate for a literal interpretation of the Bible and reject evolutionary theory. Ham is a vocal proponent of biblical creationism, and his views on marriage reflect his larger worldview that hinges on the truth of Genesis and the belief in God as the creator of all things. This quote is part of his broader agenda to defend what he perceives as traditional biblical values in the face of modern secularism.

Ham’s statement also reflects a specific stance on the nature of marriage and gender roles, particularly within the context of his religious beliefs. He argues that if Genesis—and by extension, the Bible—is not accepted as the truth, then there is no objective foundation for defining marriage as the union between a man and a woman. In this view, marriage becomes subjective and malleable, and its traditional meaning is lost. Ham’s critique is aimed at modern cultural shifts, such as the growing acceptance of same-sex marriage, which he believes challenges the biblical definition of marriage.

Ultimately, Ken Ham’s quote underscores the tension between traditional religious beliefs and evolving societal norms. For Ham, the Bible—specifically Genesis—is the absolute foundation for understanding marriage and human identity. His perspective reflects the broader debate about the role of faith in shaping cultural and legal definitions of marriage, especially in light of changing attitudes toward gender and sexuality.