Rigid, state-enforced sex equality is a Marxist policy, pursued to the outer limits in the old East Germany and now being adopted here.

In this quote, Peter Hitchens, a British journalist and commentator, is expressing his opposition to what he perceives as an overreach in policies aimed at achieving sex equality. He refers to rigid, state-enforced sex equality as a Marxist policy, drawing a direct connection between policies that enforce gender equality and the principles of Marxism. Hitchens implies that such policies, which seek to ensure equal rights and opportunities for men and women, are not just progressive but ideologically driven by Marxist ideals, which he views as problematic.

Hitchens points to East Germany (the former German Democratic Republic) as an example of where state-enforced equality was pursued to its extreme limits. In the former communist regime, policies were often implemented to enforce equality across all aspects of life, including gender roles, with the state playing a significant role in regulating social structures. Hitchens suggests that this level of government intervention in personal and social matters is akin to Marxist principles, where the state plays an active role in shaping societal norms and structures to fit ideological goals.

By saying that such policies are now being "adopted here," Hitchens is expressing concern that similar gender equality measures are gaining ground in the West, particularly in Britain. He seems to be warning against the increasing influence of state-driven policies that, in his view, may lead to the suppression of personal freedoms in the name of equality. Hitchens’ critique reflects a broader tension in political discourse over the balance between promoting social justice and preserving individual liberties from state interference.

Ultimately, Hitchens’ quote highlights his skepticism of state-enforced equality measures, particularly when he sees them as part of a broader Marxist agenda. His perspective reflects a belief in personal freedom and individualism, where he argues that the pursuit of gender equality should not come at the cost of state control over personal and social choices.