Our elite believe in a new trinity of equality, democracy and diversity. Indeed, after the Cold War, we declared the spread of democracy worldwide to be our historic mission and national goal.

In this quote, Pat Buchanan, an American political commentator and former presidential candidate, critiques what he perceives as the guiding principles of the elite in Western society. He refers to a "new trinity" of equality, democracy, and diversity, which he suggests has become the dominant ideological framework in the post-Cold War era. Buchanan argues that these values have been elevated to almost a sacred status by the ruling class, shaping both domestic policies and foreign relations, especially after the end of the Cold War.

The second part of the quote reflects Buchanan’s criticism of the United States' role in promoting democracy globally, particularly in the years following the end of the Cold War. He asserts that the spread of democracy was declared a historic mission and national goal, implying that it became a central focus of U.S. foreign policy. Buchanan, however, seems skeptical of this idealistic mission, questioning whether it has been pursued for genuine democratic principles or for the political and economic interests of the West.

Buchanan’s reference to the "new trinity" also highlights his critique of how these values are used to justify actions on the global stage. He implies that the emphasis on democracy and diversity has sometimes been a cover for imperialistic or interventionist policies, particularly in regions where the U.S. has sought to influence governments or change political systems. For Buchanan, this framework of values may have been used as a justification for actions that may not always align with the interests or cultures of the nations involved.

Ultimately, Buchanan’s statement reflects his conservative stance on both domestic and foreign policy. By describing the spread of democracy as a "mission," he critiques the notion that these ideals are universally beneficial or appropriate for every society. His view emphasizes the sovereignty of nations and the potential risks of imposing a singular set of values on the world stage, suggesting that such efforts may be misguided or counterproductive.