Open borders would be clear access to this country without going through a legal immigration process, and that's exactly what Mrs. Clinton is wanting us to do.

In this quote, Darryl Glenn critiques the idea of open borders and associates it with unrestricted access to the United States without the need for a legal immigration process. He argues that the concept of open borders implies allowing individuals to enter the country without going through the standard procedures, such as applying for a visa or being vetted for entry. Glenn suggests that this is something Mrs. Clinton—likely referring to Hillary Clinton—advocates for, claiming that she supports policies that would make immigration easier without strict legal protocols.

The quote reflects a political debate about immigration and border security, with Glenn positioning open borders as a risky and undesirable policy. He is drawing attention to concerns about illegal immigration and potential security risks, which some argue could arise if immigration laws were loosened or bypassed. By referencing Hillary Clinton, Glenn is aligning her with a position he views as favorable to unrestricted immigration, thus framing the debate in terms of the potential consequences for the country’s sovereignty and security.

Glenn’s statement taps into the broader ideological divide over how best to manage immigration, with some advocating for more stringent controls and others calling for more inclusive or humanitarian approaches. The mention of open borders is often used by critics to describe policies they believe would lead to unregulated immigration, though proponents of immigration reform typically argue for pathways that balance security with the ability to welcome those in need.

Ultimately, Glenn’s quote highlights the tension surrounding U.S. immigration policy and the differing views on how to handle border security and legal immigration. His reference to open borders and his critique of Clinton’s stance on the issue reflect the polarized nature of the debate, with strong opinions on both sides about how to address the complexities of immigration in America.