If you cannot work on the marriage or the women is a moron, staying married and cheating makes the most sense because divorce is disruptive to the family life and your bank account.

In this quote, Al Goldstein, a controversial figure known for his outspoken and often provocative views on relationships and sexuality, makes a stark and cynical statement about marriage and infidelity. Goldstein suggests that in situations where one cannot or does not want to work on a marriage and believes the partner to be less than capable or intelligent, staying married and cheating may seem like the most practical option. His perspective centers around avoiding the disruption caused by divorce, which he implies could be costly both in terms of family life and finances.

The mention of divorce as disruptive to family life reflects a common societal concern that the breakdown of a marriage can have lasting negative effects on children, family dynamics, and personal well-being. Goldstein points to the financial cost of divorce as a significant factor, with the bank account being a clear motivator for maintaining the appearance of a stable marriage, even if it involves infidelity. His blunt view suggests a transactional approach to marriage, where financial and practical concerns outweigh emotional fulfillment or moral considerations.

Goldstein's comment also carries a misogynistic undertone, as he refers to the wife as a moron, demeaning her intelligence and implying that her value in the marriage is diminished. This reflects his tendency to make provocative, often controversial statements about women and gender roles, aligning with his broader reputation for dismissive and crude commentary on relationships.

Ultimately, this quote represents a cynical and pragmatic take on marriage, where the emotional and ethical dimensions of commitment are overshadowed by convenience and financial stability. While Goldstein’s views may resonate with some who see marriage as a societal institution with more practical implications than personal ones, they also reveal a deeply unromantic and critical view of the institution of marriage.