If we wish to know the force of human genius, we should read Shakespeare. If we wish to see the insignificance of human learning, we may study his commentators.

The quote by William Hazlitt, “If we wish to know the force of human genius, we should read Shakespeare. If we wish to see the insignificance of human learning, we may study his commentators,” offers a sharp reflection on the contrast between true creativity and overly analytical interpretation. Hazlitt, an English essayist and critic of the early 19th century, often celebrated literary brilliance while critiquing pedantry. Here, he emphasizes the unparalleled genius of Shakespeare, suggesting that the author’s work embodies the height of human imagination and insight.

By contrasting Shakespeare with his commentators, Hazlitt critiques those who attempt to overanalyze or intellectualize great art. While commentators rely on learned commentary and rigid scholarship, they often fail to capture the original brilliance and emotional depth of the work itself. This underscores the idea that excessive learning or bookish study can sometimes obscure rather than illuminate the essence of true genius.

The quote also reflects Hazlitt’s belief in the primacy of experience and intuition over mechanical learning. Shakespeare’s works inspire understanding, empathy, and awe through their richness and complexity, which cannot be fully conveyed by commentary alone. Hazlitt highlights that true insight comes from engaging directly with the creative mind, rather than relying solely on scholarly interpretations.

In essence, William Hazlitt’s words serve as a reminder of the enduring power of original genius and the limitations of academic learning when it is disconnected from genuine appreciation. They encourage readers to value direct engagement with creative works, recognizing the profound force of artistic brilliance while remaining cautious of interpretations that may dilute or miss its impact.