Hydroelectric dams remain the way many poor countries gain access to reliable electricity, and both solar and wind might be worthwhile in some circumstances. But there is nothing in either their history or their physical attributes that suggests solar and wind in particular could or should be the centerpiece of efforts to deal with climate change.

In this quote, environmental writer and policy advocate Michael Shellenberger challenges conventional views about renewable energy sources, specifically emphasizing the practical benefits of hydroelectric dams in providing reliable electricity to developing nations. Shellenberger argues that hydroelectric power has historically proven effective in lifting poor countries out of energy poverty, enabling economic growth and development.

He acknowledges the potential value of solar and wind energy, suggesting that these renewable technologies might be worthwhile in some circumstances. However, Shellenberger is skeptical about positioning them as the primary solution to climate issues. He points out that neither their historical performance nor their inherent physical characteristics support the idea that solar and wind should be the centerpiece of efforts to combat climate change.

Originating from Shellenberger's broader critique of mainstream environmentalism, this statement reflects his argument that practical, evidence-based solutions, like hydroelectric power, should be prioritized over ideological commitments to certain renewable technologies. He calls for a realistic assessment of energy solutions based on effectiveness, reliability, and scalability, rather than solely on ideological or symbolic appeal.