But I think it's up to a local congregation to determine whether or not a marriage should be blessed of God. And it shouldn't be up to the government.

But I think it's up to
But I think it's up to
But I think it's up to a local congregation to determine whether or not a marriage should be blessed of God. And it shouldn't be up to the government.
But I think it's up to
But I think it's up to a local congregation to determine whether or not a marriage should be blessed of God. And it shouldn't be up to the government.
But I think it's up to
But I think it's up to a local congregation to determine whether or not a marriage should be blessed of God. And it shouldn't be up to the government.
But I think it's up to
But I think it's up to a local congregation to determine whether or not a marriage should be blessed of God. And it shouldn't be up to the government.
But I think it's up to
But I think it's up to a local congregation to determine whether or not a marriage should be blessed of God. And it shouldn't be up to the government.
But I think it's up to
But I think it's up to
But I think it's up to
But I think it's up to
But I think it's up to
But I think it's up to

Tony Campolo’s statement, “But I think it's up to a local congregation to determine whether or not a marriage should be blessed of God. And it shouldn't be up to the government,” reflects his belief in the separation of religious authority and governmental power. He emphasizes that the spiritual validation of a marriage—its blessing by God—should be guided by the local congregation and the community of faith, rather than dictated by civil or political institutions.

Campolo’s use of local congregation underscores the importance of community and grassroots decision-making in spiritual matters. He suggests that faith-based institutions are best positioned to interpret moral and religious standards for themselves, rather than having these decisions imposed externally. This perspective frames marriage as both a personal and communal religious experience, distinct from legal or civil recognition.

The origin of this quote lies in Campolo’s career as an American sociologist, pastor, and public speaker, known for his progressive Christian views on social justice and ethics. As someone often engaged in debates over same-sex marriage and the role of faith in public life, he frequently highlighted the distinction between religious practice and governmental regulation. His remarks reflect a nuanced position: supporting religious discretion while advocating for civil neutrality in issues of marriage.

At its core, the quote is a call for religious freedom and personal conscience. Campolo argues that decisions about spiritual blessing and moral validation should remain within the faith community, while the government maintains a neutral role in legal recognition. His words highlight the tension between religion and state, emphasizing respect for both institutional authority and individual belief.

Would you like me to also contextualize this in relation to debates on same-sex marriage legislation in the U.S.?

Tony Campolo
Tony Campolo

American - Clergyman Born: February 25, 1935

Have 0 Comment But I think it's up to

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender
0.45054 sec| 2552.602 kb