A written constitution guides and directs the application of law in a way utterly unlike oral guidance. It reminds us that the certainty and consistency of legal application is essential.

In this quote, Edwin Meese emphasizes the importance of a written constitution in ensuring the certainty and consistency of the application of law. He argues that a written document provides a clear, fixed set of rules and principles that govern legal matters, which is significantly different from oral guidance, which can be more ambiguous and subject to interpretation. A written constitution, according to Meese, serves as a foundational reference point that helps to maintain order and stability within the legal system.

Meese stresses that the certainty provided by a written constitution is crucial in ensuring that laws are applied fairly and uniformly across all individuals. Without such a clear framework, legal interpretations could vary widely, leading to potential injustices or uneven applications of the law. By codifying laws in a written form, a country ensures that its legal principles are not only transparent but also accessible to all, creating a more accountable and just system.

The origin of the quote can be traced to Meese’s tenure as Attorney General under President Ronald Reagan, where he frequently advocated for the originalist interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. Meese was a strong proponent of interpreting laws based on their original meaning, arguing that a written constitution provides a stable and consistent legal framework that prevents the arbitrary evolution of law through judicial interpretation.

Ultimately, Meese’s quote underscores the vital role that a written constitution plays in providing a clear, consistent, and predictable foundation for legal systems. It highlights the necessity of codifying legal principles to safeguard fairness and maintain the integrity of the law, ensuring that the rule of law is applied uniformly across all levels of society.