A woman who thinks she is intelligent demands the same rights as man. An intelligent woman gives up.

In this quote, Sidonie Gabrielle Colette, a French author and feminist, presents a somewhat provocative perspective on gender equality and the role of women in society. She contrasts two types of women: one who thinks she is intelligent and demands the same rights as man, and another who is truly intelligent and "gives up." The quote suggests that women who assert their intelligence and fight for equal rights are merely deluding themselves, while a truly intelligent woman, in Colette’s view, would realize the futility of such demands and choose a different path.

Colette’s quote appears to critique the gender dynamics of her time, implying that the fight for equality might not always be the most practical or effective approach for a woman, particularly in a world that undervalues her contributions. She seems to imply that societal norms and power structures are so deeply entrenched that an intelligent woman, rather than fighting against them, would choose to “give up”—perhaps by accepting her role within those confines or finding subtle ways to thrive within the system without overtly challenging it.

This interpretation aligns with Colette’s complex relationship with feminism. While she is often regarded as a pioneer for women’s rights and sexual liberation, her writing and views also reflected a certain ambivalence about the best ways for women to achieve freedom and self-empowerment. Colette often explored themes of individualism, personal autonomy, and sexuality, and this quote may reflect her belief that the pursuit of traditional feminist goals might not always align with personal fulfillment or true intelligence.

Ultimately, the quote encapsulates Colette's cynical view of gender equality and empowerment, urging women to consider a more nuanced or pragmatic approach to their lives and aspirations. While it may be controversial, it challenges the notion that asserting one's rights is always the smartest or most fulfilling path, suggesting instead that true intelligence might involve a quieter, more strategic form of resilience.