Who would think it possible to redirect historical scholarship by explaining what Thomas Jefferson said in the Declaration of Independence?

In this quote, Edmund Morgan reflects on the seemingly paradoxical idea of redirecting historical scholarship by focusing on what Thomas Jefferson said in the Declaration of Independence. Morgan questions whether it is truly possible to change the course of historical research simply by revisiting the words of one of America's Founding Fathers. He implies that while Jefferson's declaration is fundamental to the founding of the United States, the notion of reshaping scholarship solely through his words may seem overly simplistic or unlikely.

Morgan’s remark highlights the complexity of historical scholarship, suggesting that historians should not merely rely on well-known documents or speeches to interpret the past. The Declaration of Independence, while incredibly important, is just one piece of the historical puzzle. Morgan’s statement may be a critique of over-reliance on certain iconic texts, urging scholars to look beyond them to fully understand the broader historical context and forces at play.

The origin of this quote comes from Edmund Morgan, a respected historian known for his work on early American history. Morgan is famous for his research on colonial America and the life of Thomas Jefferson, as well as his influential book, American Slavery, American Freedom. His scholarship often questioned the contradictions and complexities within American history, particularly regarding the ideals of freedom and the realities of slavery in the early Republic.

In this context, Morgan’s quote reflects a deeper exploration of how historical narratives are constructed and the challenges in interpreting the past. While Jefferson's words in the Declaration of Independence are critical to understanding American ideals, Morgan suggests that focusing solely on them may overlook the complexities and contradictions that define American history. His comment encourages a more nuanced approach to historical scholarship, one that takes into account a wider range of perspectives and sources.