I think my legacy will be in what most people don't like about me: my style - the separation between judge and lawyers, judge and politics, the real independence of the judiciary from the executive, from the legislative, from money. I'm criticized in Brazil because of that. In the end, I hope to prevail.

In this quote, Joaquim Barbosa, a prominent Brazilian judge and former President of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil, reflects on his legacy, emphasizing the independence of the judiciary as the key aspect of his career. Barbosa acknowledges that his approach, particularly his style, has been controversial, especially the way he has maintained a separation between the judge and lawyers, and between the judiciary and politics. He sees this as essential to ensuring fairness and impartiality in the legal system, even if it has drawn criticism from certain factions in Brazil.

Barbosa's commitment to judicial independence is central to his statement. He stresses the importance of keeping the judiciary free from external influences, such as the executive, the legislative, and even financial interests. This separation, according to Barbosa, is crucial for upholding the integrity of the judicial process and preventing corruption or political interference in legal decisions. His focus on independence demonstrates his belief that the judiciary should act as an impartial body, separate from the powers that be in government or business.

The criticism Barbosa mentions, particularly in Brazil, refers to how his strict adherence to judicial independence and separation from politics has made him a target for those who may feel threatened by his decisions. His insistence on maintaining this independence, especially when confronting powerful political or corporate interests, has likely led to backlash, as he mentions in the quote. However, Barbosa remains resolute, stating that despite the criticism, he hopes to prevail in ensuring the integrity of the judiciary.

Ultimately, Barbosa’s quote reflects his belief in the long-term value of a just and independent judiciary, one that is not swayed by external pressures but remains committed to upholding the rule of law. His legacy, as he sees it, will be rooted in his unwavering stance on maintaining this separation and independence, even at the cost of personal criticism or political unpopularity.