Yet we have learned from the Scottish independence vote and with Brexit what referendums do to our politics. They foster bitter divisions in ways that parliamentary elections tend not to do.

Owen Jones’ quote reflects on the divisive nature of referendums and how they can impact politics. He points to both the Scottish independence vote and Brexit as examples of how direct democratic votes can create deep, lasting divisions within a society. According to Jones, these types of votes tend to lead to polarized opinions, as opposed to parliamentary elections, which, while still contentious, generally don’t have the same level of emotional or ideological separation between the electorate.

The origin of this sentiment stems from Jones’ critique of recent political events in the UK, especially the Brexit referendum in 2016 and the Scottish independence referendum in 2014. Both of these votes led to intense political and social rifts within the country, with individuals and communities split sharply over the issues of national identity, sovereignty, and political affiliation. Unlike general elections, where individuals vote for representatives without directly deciding major constitutional changes, referendums present binary choices that often force people to take sides in a way that is much harder to reconcile later on.

Jones argues that referendums, by offering a yes-or-no choice, reduce complex political issues into oversimplified terms, leaving little room for compromise or nuanced discussion. The outcome of such a vote, particularly in the cases of Brexit and Scottish independence, has had lasting consequences on political discourse, fostering a sense of permanent division rather than fostering national unity. This is contrasted with parliamentary elections, where ongoing negotiations and compromises can more easily smooth over divisions over time.

In essence, the quote highlights the risks associated with using referendums to resolve deeply contentious issues, suggesting that while they may offer direct democratic expression, they can also create deep fractures in society that are difficult to heal. Jones warns that such votes have a tendency to bring out sharp political and social polarization, which can be more difficult to address than the more gradual, compromise-oriented approach of parliamentary systems.