When a machine begins to run without human aid, it is time to scrap it - whether it be a factory or a government.

Alexander Chase’s quote, "When a machine begins to run without human aid, it is time to scrap it - whether it be a factory or a government," reflects his concern about the loss of human control over systems that should be responsive to people's needs. Chase uses the metaphor of a machine to represent systems—be they factories or governments—that, once automated or left to operate without human guidance, can become inefficient, detached, or even harmful. He suggests that when any system operates independently of human involvement, it may no longer serve its intended purpose and could be doing more harm than good.

The origin of this quote is rooted in Chase's broader views on the relationship between technology, society, and governance. Chase, known for his insights on politics and social issues, implies that over-reliance on automated or bureaucratic systems can lead to a lack of accountability and human oversight. Whether in a factory or a government, a system that functions without proper oversight or adaptability can result in negative outcomes, as it becomes disconnected from the needs and concerns of the people it was designed to serve.

Chase’s critique of a government functioning like a machine implies that, if leadership becomes rigid or overly mechanized, it can no longer respond effectively to the changing demands of its people. Just as a factory needs human oversight to ensure its operations align with objectives and ethical standards, so does government need human engagement and accountability to ensure it serves the best interests of the public. When a government operates without meaningful input or checks from its citizens, it risks becoming a detached and potentially oppressive entity.

In essence, Chase's quote serves as a warning against the dangers of systems—whether technological or political—that become too self-sustaining and lose sight of the human element. The scrapping of such systems, as he suggests, becomes necessary to reassert human agency and accountability. It’s a call for constant vigilance and active participation to ensure that systems remain responsive, adaptable, and aligned with human values and needs.