What are we fighting the terrorists for if we ourselves do not even stand up for democracy - civil liberties and fundamental rights - which includes independence of the judiciary?

In this quote, Nawaz Sharif, the former Prime Minister of Pakistan, raises a profound moral question about the fight against terrorism. He challenges the idea of defending democracy, civil liberties, and fundamental rights abroad while failing to uphold these values within one’s own country. Sharif suggests that if a nation is willing to engage in a global fight against terrorism, it must first ensure that its own commitment to democratic principles is unwavering, particularly in terms of defending independence of the judiciary.

Sharif's reference to civil liberties and fundamental rights emphasizes the importance of protecting the basic freedoms that are often taken for granted in a democratic society. For him, standing up for democracy means more than just advocating for freedom of speech or elections; it involves safeguarding the independence of the judiciary and ensuring that the legal system remains fair, impartial, and free from political interference. This is especially crucial in the fight against terrorism, as the rule of law plays a key role in maintaining justice and order in the face of threats.

The origin of this quote comes from a broader reflection on the challenges faced by Pakistan and many other nations that were dealing with the growing threat of terrorism while also grappling with issues of democratic governance. Sharif is pointing out a fundamental contradiction: if a country promotes democracy and freedom abroad, it must ensure that these same values are protected at home. For Sharif, the legitimacy of a nation’s foreign policy efforts depends on the strength of its internal democratic institutions.

Ultimately, Sharif’s statement is a call to consistency in values. He argues that if a country is fighting for global peace and against extremism, it must do so by adhering to its own democratic principles, particularly ensuring that core institutions, like the judiciary, are allowed to function independently and without undue influence. Without these safeguards, the fight against terrorism becomes hollow and undermines the very freedoms the nation seeks to protect.