The independence of the economic sphere was a tenet of faith with Liberalism.

In this quote, Francis Parker Yockey, an American philosopher and political theorist, discusses the connection between economic independence and Liberalism. He asserts that the independence of the economic sphere was a fundamental belief for Liberalism, meaning that Liberals traditionally advocated for a separation between economic activities and government control. Yockey suggests that within Liberal ideology, economic freedom was essential for individual liberty, and the market should be allowed to operate without heavy governmental interference or regulation.

Yockey's reference to economic independence reflects the classical Liberal belief in free markets, where private individuals and businesses are given the freedom to engage in economic activities without restrictions imposed by the state. This idea is closely tied to the laissez-faire approach to capitalism, which advocates for minimal government intervention in economic affairs. The tenet of faith Yockey mentions indicates that this belief was central to the ideological framework of Liberalism and was considered a core principle by its proponents.

The origin of this quote can be traced to Yockey’s critique of Liberalism and its ideological foundations. As a political theorist who critiqued both Liberalism and Western democracy, Yockey believed that Liberalism’s emphasis on economic independence and individual freedoms was flawed and ultimately led to societal fragmentation. His writings often focused on the dangers of globalism and the erosion of traditional cultural and national values, which he felt were undermined by the economic ideologies rooted in Liberal thought.

In essence, Yockey’s quote underscores the centrality of economic independence in Liberalism and highlights the ideological conflict between state control and market freedom. It reflects his broader critique of Liberalism, suggesting that while the ideology promoted individual economic freedom, it also contributed to the destabilization of cultural and national unity, a key concern in his overall political philosophy.