Literary readings aren't going to shake their reputation as the added-fibre of our entertainment diet until the people who organize and participate in them snap out of this mentality.

In this quote, Lynn Coady critiques the reputation of literary readings, suggesting that they are often viewed as the "added-fibre" of entertainment—something good for you but not necessarily exciting or engaging. By comparing literary readings to something like fiber in a diet, Coady implies that they are often seen as an unexciting or hard-to-digest part of culture, offering value in a health-conscious sense but not necessarily in terms of pure entertainment or enjoyment.

Coady argues that literary readings will continue to be perceived this way until those who organize and participate in them change their approach. She believes that the people involved in literary readings—whether writers, organizers, or audiences—need to snap out of this mentality and rethink how these events are presented. The implication is that literary readings need to evolve, perhaps by being more dynamic, accessible, or engaging, in order to shed the label of being merely a "dull" or "obligatory" form of culture.

The quote suggests that literature and the act of reading can be more than just intellectual exercises or cultural obligations—they can be thrilling, impactful, and as enjoyable as any other form of entertainment. Coady is urging a shift in how literary events are perceived and promoted, advocating for them to be treated with the same level of excitement and engagement that other forms of entertainment receive.

Ultimately, Lynn Coady’s quote challenges the current state of literary readings, calling for a transformation in how they are organized and experienced. By doing so, she suggests that literature can become a more dynamic and engaging part of the entertainment landscape, rather than being relegated to the realm of intellectual duty or an afterthought in people's entertainment choices.