Liberalism is a religion. Its tenets cannot be proved, its capacity for waste and destruction demonstrated. But it affords a feeling of spiritual rectitude at little or no cost.

In the quote, "Liberalism is a religion. Its tenets cannot be proved, its capacity for waste and destruction demonstrated. But it affords a feeling of spiritual rectitude at little or no cost," David Mamet draws a provocative comparison between liberalism and religion, suggesting that both share certain characteristics. He argues that liberalism, like a faith system, is based on beliefs and principles that cannot be empirically proven or tested. In this way, Mamet critiques liberalism as an ideology rooted more in personal conviction and a sense of moral superiority than in practical or measurable outcomes.

Mamet’s description of liberalism as a religion also alludes to what he sees as its dogmatic qualities. Just as religious doctrines often involve belief in the unseen or unprovable, liberal principles, according to Mamet, are followed by some with a similar unquestioning faith. He implies that liberal policies, while well-intentioned, have often led to waste and destruction, particularly when those policies are not grounded in pragmatic solutions or proven results. By invoking these terms, Mamet suggests that liberalism can sometimes create harm, much like misguided religious zealotry might.

However, Mamet also acknowledges that liberalism, like religion, provides a sense of spiritual rectitude—a feeling of moral righteousness or personal virtue. For some, adhering to liberal ideals gives them a sense of doing the right thing, even if these beliefs don’t lead to concrete, positive change. The phrase "at little or no cost" reflects his view that adopting such a belief system is relatively easy and requires little personal sacrifice or accountability, making it an attractive ideology for many.

David Mamet, a renowned American playwright and essayist, is known for his sharp, often controversial commentary on politics and society. His quote critiques liberalism from a perspective that emphasizes real-world consequences over ideological purity, suggesting that while liberalism may feel good or virtuous, its outcomes often fall short. Mamet's perspective has drawn criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, making him a divisive but thought-provoking figure in American political discourse.