Irregularity and want of method are only supportable in men of great learning or genius, who are often too full to be exact, and therefore they choose to throw down their pearls in heaps before the reader, rather than be at the pains of stringing them.

Joseph Addison’s quote reflects on the irregularity and lack of method in the work of individuals who possess exceptional learning or genius. Addison suggests that people of great intellectual ability, whether scholars, artists, or thinkers, may not always present their ideas in an organized or structured way. Instead of carefully arranging their thoughts or writing with precision, they tend to express themselves freely and abundantly, as if throwing pearls before the reader, rather than putting in the effort to string them into a coherent narrative.

Addison’s mention of “great learning or genius” speaks to the idea that those with profound knowledge or talent often work in ways that transcend traditional methods. They might be so full of ideas or insights that they don't focus on neatness or order. Their work may appear more spontaneous or scattered, as they are more concerned with expressing their rich thoughts than with adhering to rigid structures. This kind of intellectual overflow may be challenging for readers but can also reveal the depth and complexity of their thinking.

The metaphor of “throwing pearls in heaps” highlights the abundance and value of the ideas being presented, despite the lack of organization. Addison is acknowledging that the work of a genius might not always be easy to follow, but it has intrinsic worth. The “pearls” represent valuable insights or wisdom, and though they may not be presented in a polished form, they still carry significant meaning for those willing to engage with them.

Addison’s quote suggests that methodical presentation may not always be necessary for those with great intellect, as their ideas are often profound enough to withstand less formal expression. At the same time, the quote serves as a commentary on the delicate balance between clarity and creativity, and how individuals of great brilliance might prioritize the richness of their ideas over the conventions of organization and structure.