In a way, I think science is the modern religion, and at times, I despise it as much as I despise other religions because it really will only accept stuff that fits its masculine ability to define the world.

The quote by Mark Rylance, “In a way, I think science is the modern religion, and at times, I despise it as much as I despise other religions because it really will only accept stuff that fits its masculine ability to define the world,” critiques the limitations and rigidity of modern scientific thought. Rylance suggests that science, like religion, can sometimes be exclusive, valuing only what fits its frameworks and dismissing knowledge or perspectives that do not conform. The quote highlights the tension between objectivity and the human desire for broader understanding, particularly acknowledging the gendered bias inherent in certain structures of knowledge.

Mark Rylance, an English actor and activist, is known for his thoughtful reflections on society, culture, and human behavior. This quote reflects his concern with the ways institutions—whether religious or scientific—can become dogmatic. By likening science to a modern religion, Rylance emphasizes that even systems rooted in reason and evidence are not immune to power dynamics, exclusion, and bias.

The origin of the quote comes from Rylance’s interviews and writings where he explores the intersection of knowledge, culture, and societal norms. He critiques the assumption that science is always neutral, pointing out that its historical development has often reflected male-dominated perspectives, which shape what is considered valid knowledge. The quote urges a reflection on how both science and religion can limit understanding when they refuse to embrace diverse viewpoints.

Ultimately, Rylance’s words encourage a critical perspective on institutions and knowledge systems. He reminds us that true progress comes not just from adherence to established rules or methods, but from openness, inclusivity, and the willingness to question assumptions. The quote underscores the importance of balancing rational inquiry with humility and receptivity to the complexities of human experience.