I think we have to face the reality that in a society where there is a legitimate threat of terrorism, not being able to see one's face, not being able to have some sense of communication in that way, is for many societies a challenge.

In this quote, Hillary Clinton addresses the challenge posed by the veiling or concealing of faces in the context of a society that is grappling with a legitimate threat of terrorism. She suggests that the inability to see someone's face, a common form of communication and human connection, can create obstacles in ensuring security and trust in public spaces. Clinton points out that in many societies, where the visible identification of individuals is essential for safety, not being able to read someone's expressions or recognize their identity can be a challenge to social interaction and security measures.

The origin of this quote comes from Clinton’s involvement in international relations and her experience as a former U.S. Secretary of State. During her tenure, discussions about terrorism and security were prominent, especially concerning issues around the veil and the role of cultural practices in modern society. The quote reflects her views on the intersection of culture and security concerns, acknowledging the complexities that arise when cultural practices such as wearing a veil clash with security protocols.

Clinton emphasizes that the tension between personal freedoms and public safety is not a simple matter. While she acknowledges the legitimate concerns of individuals and communities regarding privacy and cultural identity, she also highlights the difficulty societies face when public safety demands more visibility and accountability. In this sense, the quote touches on broader debates surrounding the balance between individual rights and collective security in the face of modern threats.

Ultimately, Clinton's statement challenges us to think about the implications of cultural practices in a globalized world where concerns about terrorism and security often override traditional cultural norms. She raises important questions about how societies should navigate the delicate balance between respecting cultural values and ensuring public safety, especially when those values might conflict with modern security needs.