I think flying planes into a building was a faith-based initiative. I think religion is a neurological disorder.

In this quote, Bill Maher makes a provocative and critical statement about religion, comparing it to a neurological disorder and linking faith to extreme actions, such as the act of flying planes into a building—a reference to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Maher implies that such violent acts, often carried out by individuals motivated by religious beliefs, can be seen as a result of misguided or harmful faith-based ideologies. He suggests that religion, by promoting absolute belief in the divine and the afterlife, can distort human thinking and lead to dangerous behavior, likening it to a mental condition that affects an individual's ability to reason and act rationally.

Maher’s comparison of religion to a neurological disorder is rooted in his broader secular and skeptical worldview. He is known for critiquing religious faith and promoting a rational and scientific approach to understanding the world. His statement reflects his belief that religion, rather than providing true guidance or meaning, can sometimes cloud judgment and encourage irrational actions. This view aligns with his broader critique of faith-based thinking, which he believes often leads to intolerance, violence, and societal harm.

The origin of this quote comes from Maher’s work as a comedian and outspoken critic of organized religion. In his 2008 documentary Religulous, Maher questioned the role of religion in modern society, exploring its impact on politics, culture, and human behavior. The quote exemplifies Maher’s irreverent and provocative style, where he uses humor and shock value to challenge deeply held beliefs and to encourage people to question the influence of religion in shaping societal norms and actions.

Ultimately, Maher’s quote serves as a critique of how religion can influence individuals and societies, particularly in ways that may foster extremism and violence. By likening religious belief to a neurological disorder, he underscores the potential dangers of unchecked faith and advocates for a more rational, evidence-based approach to understanding the world. While controversial, his statement invites reflection on the intersection of religion, reason, and human behavior in the context of modern challenges.