Contrary to what we learn from progressives in education and the media, the history of the Democratic Party well into the twentieth century is a virtually uninterrupted history of thievery, corruption, and bigotry.

Dinesh D'Souza’s quote critiques the progressive narrative surrounding the history of the Democratic Party, particularly in relation to its historical role in thievery, corruption, and bigotry. He challenges the commonly accepted version of history promoted by education and the media, suggesting that the Democratic Party’s past has been sanitized or overlooked in favor of a more favorable portrayal. According to D'Souza, the party's actions through much of the twentieth century were marked by these negative qualities, which he believes are often downplayed or ignored in mainstream discussions.

D'Souza’s perspective aligns with his broader political views, which frequently critique the left-wing and its historical and contemporary policies. His argument suggests that the Democratic Party, particularly in the context of the Civil Rights Movement and segregation, has a legacy of oppression and discrimination that is frequently overlooked in favor of a narrative that focuses on its more recent progressive reforms. He asserts that the portrayal of the party as a champion of racial equality is misleading, given its earlier history of involvement in slavery, segregation, and the Jim Crow laws.

The origin of this quote is rooted in D'Souza’s controversial political views and his focus on historical revisionism. As an author and political commentator, he has often argued that the modern Democratic Party and its members have obscured or ignored their party’s involvement in some of the most significant moral failings of the past, particularly in terms of racial issues. His statement reflects his belief that education and the media often present a distorted view of American history, one that downplays the negative aspects of certain political movements.

This quote, which appears in the context of D'Souza’s critique of modern American politics, is part of his larger argument that historical facts are often manipulated to serve political narratives. He urges his audience to look beyond the mainstream narrative and reconsider the historical legacy of political parties, especially in terms of racial justice and social equality.