A building is no good if someone's got to explain to you why it's good. You can't say you don't know enough about architecture - that's ridiculous. It's got to work on many levels.

A building is no good if
A building is no good if
A building is no good if someone's got to explain to you why it's good. You can't say you don't know enough about architecture - that's ridiculous. It's got to work on many levels.
A building is no good if
A building is no good if someone's got to explain to you why it's good. You can't say you don't know enough about architecture - that's ridiculous. It's got to work on many levels.
A building is no good if
A building is no good if someone's got to explain to you why it's good. You can't say you don't know enough about architecture - that's ridiculous. It's got to work on many levels.
A building is no good if
A building is no good if someone's got to explain to you why it's good. You can't say you don't know enough about architecture - that's ridiculous. It's got to work on many levels.
A building is no good if
A building is no good if someone's got to explain to you why it's good. You can't say you don't know enough about architecture - that's ridiculous. It's got to work on many levels.
A building is no good if
A building is no good if
A building is no good if
A building is no good if
A building is no good if
A building is no good if

The quote by David Chipperfield, “A building is no good if someone's got to explain to you why it's good. You can't say you don't know enough about architecture – that's ridiculous. It's got to work on many levels,” reflects his belief that architecture must be intuitive, accessible, and emotionally resonant. Chipperfield argues that a successful building should speak for itself—its quality should be immediately felt, not intellectually justified. This challenges the notion that only trained professionals can truly appreciate architectural merit.

By rejecting the idea that one must “know enough about architecture” to evaluate it, Chipperfield champions the democratization of design appreciation. He implies that the general public has just as much right to engage with and respond to buildings as critics or architects do. Architecture, in his view, should not be elitist or exclusive, but rather function as a universal language that communicates through materials, form, space, and light—elements everyone can sense and understand.

When he says a building must “work on many levels,” Chipperfield means it should succeed functionally, aesthetically, emotionally, and socially. Good architecture isn’t just about innovative form or technical excellence; it’s about how a space makes people feel, how it serves its users, and how it fits into its context and community. It should resonate with people on a visceral level, while also withstanding deeper scrutiny from a professional perspective.

The origin of this quote likely comes from Chipperfield’s interviews or public lectures, where he often critiques superficial or over-intellectualized design. As an architect known for clarity, restraint, and thoughtful contextualism, his work—including the Neues Museum renovation in Berlin and the James Simon Gallery—embodies this philosophy. Through this quote, Chipperfield reasserts that the value of architecture lies in its ability to be felt, understood, and appreciated by all, without the need for explanation.

David Chipperfield
David Chipperfield

British - Architect Born: December 18, 1953

Have 0 Comment A building is no good if

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender
0.36745 sec| 2561.984 kb