The fact that there were discreet channels of communication established with Iran in 2012 is something that we confirmed publicly. However, we did not have any serious prospect of reaching a nuclear deal until after the election of Hassan Rouhani in 2013. Yes, we had discussions with the Iranians before that, but they did not get anywhere.

Ben Rhodes’ quote sheds light on the complexities of diplomatic communication and the gradual development of a potential nuclear deal with Iran. He acknowledges that there were already discreet channels of communication with Iran in 2012, but those initial efforts were not successful in progressing towards a serious agreement. The significant shift came after the election of Hassan Rouhani in 2013, who brought new opportunities for dialogue and negotiation. Rhodes emphasizes that while discussions had taken place before, they lacked the momentum or prospects to lead to a breakthrough until Rouhani’s election.

The reference to discreet channels of communication reflects the behind-the-scenes nature of the early talks, which were not publicly known or widely discussed at the time. These channels allowed for informal exchanges, but without strong political will or alignment from both sides, they did not lead to substantial progress. Rhodes underscores that the real turning point in the negotiation process came only after the election of Rouhani, suggesting that leadership changes can have a significant impact on the trajectory of international diplomacy.

Rhodes also emphasizes that serious prospects for a nuclear deal only emerged after Rouhani’s election, signaling that the political climate in Iran shifted towards a willingness to engage more openly in negotiations. Before this, the discussions, although taking place, did not yield tangible results. This shift highlights the importance of timing, leadership, and alignment of political interests in achieving meaningful diplomatic agreements.

In essence, Rhodes’ quote reflects the often slow and complex nature of international negotiations, particularly on sensitive issues like nuclear deals. The process is influenced by both external and internal factors, such as leadership changes, political will, and the willingness of all parties to engage in constructive dialogue.