That attitude does not exist so much today, but in those days there was a very sharp distinction between basic physics and applied physics. Columbia did not deal with applied physics.

That attitude does not exist so
That attitude does not exist so
That attitude does not exist so much today, but in those days there was a very sharp distinction between basic physics and applied physics. Columbia did not deal with applied physics.
That attitude does not exist so
That attitude does not exist so much today, but in those days there was a very sharp distinction between basic physics and applied physics. Columbia did not deal with applied physics.
That attitude does not exist so
That attitude does not exist so much today, but in those days there was a very sharp distinction between basic physics and applied physics. Columbia did not deal with applied physics.
That attitude does not exist so
That attitude does not exist so much today, but in those days there was a very sharp distinction between basic physics and applied physics. Columbia did not deal with applied physics.
That attitude does not exist so
That attitude does not exist so much today, but in those days there was a very sharp distinction between basic physics and applied physics. Columbia did not deal with applied physics.
That attitude does not exist so
That attitude does not exist so
That attitude does not exist so
That attitude does not exist so
That attitude does not exist so
That attitude does not exist so

The quote by Gordon Gould, "That attitude does not exist so much today, but in those days there was a very sharp distinction between basic physics and applied physics. Columbia did not deal with applied physics," reflects a historical perspective on the academic and research culture surrounding physics. Gould points out that during his time, there was a clear separation between basic (theoretical) physics and applied physics, with institutions like Columbia University focusing primarily on the former. This division shaped the approach to scientific inquiry and education in those days.

By noting that Columbia did not deal with applied physics, Gould highlights the university’s emphasis on fundamental scientific principles and research, rather than practical applications or technology development. This distinction suggests that applied physics was often considered less prestigious or outside the traditional academic focus at the time.

The quote also implies a shift in attitude over time, with the sharp distinction between basic and applied physics becoming less pronounced today. Modern scientific research increasingly values the integration of theory and practical application, recognizing the importance of both in advancing technology and solving real-world problems.

This quote originates from Gordon Gould, a physicist known for inventing the laser. His reflection provides insight into the evolving nature of scientific disciplines and academic culture, illustrating how perspectives on research priorities have changed over the years to embrace a more holistic view of physics.

Gordon Gould
Gordon Gould

American - Physicist July 17, 1920 - September 16, 2005

Have 0 Comment That attitude does not exist so

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender
0.19235 sec| 2544.984 kb