Sure, the comedians who swear or use scatological humor can get laughs, but they're uncomfortable laughs.

In this quote, John Ratzenberger reflects on the effectiveness of different types of comedy, particularly the kind that relies on swearing or scatological humor (humor related to bodily functions). He acknowledges that such humor can elicit laughs, but points out that these laughs are often uncomfortable. This suggests that while the humor may provoke a reaction from the audience, it doesn't necessarily create genuine, enjoyable laughter. Instead, it may evoke a sense of awkwardness or unease, highlighting the distinction between humor that feels natural versus humor that forces a reaction.

Ratzenberger's statement implies that comedy grounded in crude or shocking material might not lead to the same level of connection or satisfaction as other forms of humor. While swearing and scatological humor might rely on shock value or pushing boundaries, they can make the audience uncomfortable, as opposed to humor that builds on shared understanding or more refined wit. Ratzenberger seems to suggest that for humor to be truly effective, it should be able to create laughter that feels good and natural, not just forced.

This quote also reflects Ratzenberger's perspective on what makes good comedy. Rather than relying on crude or base humor, he implies that comedy should have a balance that entertains without making people feel uneasy. His belief in the value of subtlety or intelligence in comedy shows a preference for humor that connects with the audience on a deeper level, without needing to resort to vulgar or uncomfortable tactics.

Ultimately, John Ratzenberger’s quote suggests that while some types of humor can draw a laugh, it’s the kind that feels comfortable and natural that truly resonates with audiences. It highlights the difference between humor that merely shocks or entertains and humor that fosters a more enjoyable and lasting connection with the viewer.