Patient autonomy is paramount to the oath that we take when we enter the profession of medicine. That is why I am appalled when the federal government gets between my patients and their right to the full range of medical information and complete access to health care.

The quote by Ami Bera emphasizes the importance of patient autonomy in the practice of medicine. By stating that it is “paramount to the oath that we take,” Bera underscores that respecting a patient’s choices and decision-making is central to the ethical responsibilities of physicians. This principle asserts that patients have the right to make informed decisions about their health care based on full access to information.

Bera expresses concern about government interference, highlighting his view that the federal government should not restrict a patient’s access to medical information or limit their ability to receive appropriate health care. His use of the word “appalled” conveys a strong ethical objection, reflecting his belief that external control over patient choices undermines the fundamental trust between doctor and patient.

The origin of this quote comes from Bera’s role as both a physician and U.S. Congressman, where he frequently discusses the intersection of health policy, patient rights, and medical ethics. His experience in medicine informs his perspective on how laws and regulations can affect the quality of care and the autonomy of patients in making personal health decisions.

Overall, the quote highlights the ethical principle that patient autonomy must be preserved in all aspects of medical practice. Bera advocates for a system in which patients have complete access to information and health services, emphasizing that governmental interference should never compromise the ethical commitment of physicians to serve the best interests of their patients.