Los Angeles gives one the feeling of the future more strongly than any city I know of. A bad future, too, like something out of Fritz Lang's feeble imagination.

Los Angeles gives one the feeling
Los Angeles gives one the feeling
Los Angeles gives one the feeling of the future more strongly than any city I know of. A bad future, too, like something out of Fritz Lang's feeble imagination.
Los Angeles gives one the feeling
Los Angeles gives one the feeling of the future more strongly than any city I know of. A bad future, too, like something out of Fritz Lang's feeble imagination.
Los Angeles gives one the feeling
Los Angeles gives one the feeling of the future more strongly than any city I know of. A bad future, too, like something out of Fritz Lang's feeble imagination.
Los Angeles gives one the feeling
Los Angeles gives one the feeling of the future more strongly than any city I know of. A bad future, too, like something out of Fritz Lang's feeble imagination.
Los Angeles gives one the feeling
Los Angeles gives one the feeling of the future more strongly than any city I know of. A bad future, too, like something out of Fritz Lang's feeble imagination.
Los Angeles gives one the feeling
Los Angeles gives one the feeling
Los Angeles gives one the feeling
Los Angeles gives one the feeling
Los Angeles gives one the feeling
Los Angeles gives one the feeling

In this quote, Henry Miller, an American writer known for his provocative and often controversial works, expresses his view on Los Angeles as a city that strongly embodies the sense of the future. However, Miller doesn't see this future as hopeful or progressive; rather, he describes it as a bad future, one that seems dystopian or disconcerting. The mention of Fritz Lang, a German filmmaker famous for his 1927 expressionist film Metropolis, further emphasizes Miller’s bleak perspective on Los Angeles, comparing the city's future to something imagined by Lang but lacking in depth or substance.

Miller's comparison to Lang’s feeble imagination suggests that while Lang’s vision of a futuristic society was dark and dystopian, it was still rich with ideas and creativity. In contrast, Miller implies that Los Angeles, with its sprawling urban landscape and consumer-driven culture, presents a future that feels lacking in authenticity or meaningful innovation. This speaks to Miller's discomfort with the direction in which the city, and perhaps by extension, modern society, is headed.

The use of Los Angeles as a symbol of the future reflects the city’s role as a major hub for the entertainment industry and its reputation for superficiality, consumerism, and artificiality. Miller’s description of the city implies that it represents a future built more on appearance and consumption than on deep, substantive progress. In his eyes, this creates an environment that feels hollow and disillusioning.

Ultimately, Miller's quote is a critique of the idea of progress in a modern, consumer-driven world. He highlights how the future, as represented by Los Angeles, may lack the substance, vision, and meaningful advancement that could make it truly inspiring. Instead, it presents a version of the future that feels disconnected and unsatisfying, similar to the dystopian worlds depicted in early science fiction, but without the intellectual or artistic depth that often accompanied such visions.

Henry Miller
Henry Miller

American - Author December 26, 1891 - June 7, 1980

Have 0 Comment Los Angeles gives one the feeling

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender
0.35441 sec| 2560.805 kb