I've always liked traveling around Europe and seeing the architecture. The buildings in capital cities have been there for hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years. Some look better than the new ones.
The quote by Joe Elliott, "I've always liked traveling around Europe and seeing the architecture. The buildings in capital cities have been there for hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years. Some look better than the new ones," reflects a deep appreciation for historic architecture and the enduring beauty of European cityscapes. Elliott, best known as the lead singer of the rock band Def Leppard, expresses a sentiment that resonates with many travelers: a sense of awe at the craftsmanship, elegance, and timelessness of old buildings, especially those found in European capitals.
By noting that some older structures "look better than the new ones," Elliott points to a common criticism of certain aspects of contemporary architecture—that it can lack the character, detail, and sense of place found in historic buildings. Many older structures were built with a focus on aesthetics, durability, and civic pride, and they often serve as cultural landmarks that define a city's identity. Their continued presence through centuries reflects not only architectural skill but also historical continuity.
Elliott's observation also touches on the contrast between tradition and modernity. While modern architecture can be innovative and efficient, it sometimes fails to evoke the same emotional connection as buildings that have stood the test of time. His admiration for these old structures suggests a longing for a human-centered design that prioritizes beauty, context, and lasting value—qualities often celebrated in classical and vernacular European architecture.
Ultimately, the quote underscores how architecture can serve as a living memory, connecting people to the past while shaping the way they experience the present. Elliott's words remind us that the built environment is not just functional—it’s deeply cultural and aesthetic, capable of inspiring both musicians and architects alike.
TPTran Pham
Traveling does open your eyes to how architecture reflects culture and time. I’ve always been fascinated by how certain cities manage to blend the old with the new—London or Vienna, for instance. Do you think the admiration for old architecture should influence current design practices more? Or should we focus on creating something new entirely, even if it doesn't immediately appeal the way older buildings do?
QHvu quoc huy
I feel torn when I read this. On one hand, I agree—many historic buildings have a charm and grandeur that modern architecture seems to lack. On the other, some new designs are incredibly innovative and sustainable. I wonder, is it really fair to compare the two when they come from such different technological and cultural contexts? Shouldn't both have their own space and value in our urban landscapes?
PNHa Phuong Nhung
This quote hits on a really interesting point about the perception of quality over time. Why do you think so many people feel that older buildings are more beautiful or meaningful? Is it about the history they carry, the artistry of traditional techniques, or perhaps the cultural value placed on preservation? And do you think modern cities will ever inspire the same awe in future generations?
DHDu Hoang
I’ve felt the same way traveling through Europe. There’s a certain dignity and permanence to older architecture that newer buildings often lack. But I also wonder if we’re being unfairly critical of modern design. Could it be that today’s buildings simply haven’t aged enough for us to appreciate them fully? Maybe in a hundred years, people will admire the sleek lines of a modernist structure the same way we admire Baroque churches now.
TTBui Thi Thanh Thao
I totally get what Joe Elliott is saying—there's something soul-stirring about walking through the streets of Rome or Paris and being surrounded by centuries of history. But it does make me question: Are modern buildings too focused on efficiency and not enough on lasting beauty? Have we lost the patience or vision to build things meant to stand the test of time, both structurally and aesthetically?