In 1977, at least, he wished to have people believe that he shared and was proud of an attitude toward women that is not acceptable in a politician. In 2003, all he has said is that he doesn't remember the interview.

The quote by Michael Kinsley, "In 1977, at least, he wished to have people believe that he shared and was proud of an attitude toward women that is not acceptable in a politician. In 2003, all he has said is that he doesn't remember the interview," critiques a politician’s past and present stance on his behavior and views regarding women. Kinsley points out a significant change in the politician’s attitude over time—from openly expressing pride in controversial views to later denying or distancing himself from those statements. This highlights issues of accountability and honesty in public life.

By referencing 1977, Kinsley emphasizes the period when the politician openly embraced an unacceptable attitude toward women, which Kinsley suggests should disqualify someone from holding political office. The quote underscores how such an attitude conflicts with the ethical standards expected from leaders, reflecting broader societal expectations about respect and equality.

The contrast with 2003, when the politician claims he "doesn't remember the interview," illustrates a shift toward evasion or denial. This discrepancy reveals how public figures sometimes try to rewrite or avoid past controversial remarks to protect their reputations. Kinsley’s critique exposes the tension between past behavior and present accountability.

This quote originates from Michael Kinsley, a political commentator known for his incisive critiques of politicians and political culture. His statement calls attention to the importance of consistent values and the need for politicians to own their past actions, especially when those actions reflect problematic attitudes toward important social issues like gender equality.