If you put a woman in prison for four years when she's young and make her pay her time in a horrible place and she wants to come out and work, and become a mother and be a contributor to society and pay taxes and you never give her that chance. There is something un-Canadian about that.

If you put a woman in
If you put a woman in
If you put a woman in prison for four years when she's young and make her pay her time in a horrible place and she wants to come out and work, and become a mother and be a contributor to society and pay taxes and you never give her that chance. There is something un-Canadian about that.
If you put a woman in
If you put a woman in prison for four years when she's young and make her pay her time in a horrible place and she wants to come out and work, and become a mother and be a contributor to society and pay taxes and you never give her that chance. There is something un-Canadian about that.
If you put a woman in
If you put a woman in prison for four years when she's young and make her pay her time in a horrible place and she wants to come out and work, and become a mother and be a contributor to society and pay taxes and you never give her that chance. There is something un-Canadian about that.
If you put a woman in
If you put a woman in prison for four years when she's young and make her pay her time in a horrible place and she wants to come out and work, and become a mother and be a contributor to society and pay taxes and you never give her that chance. There is something un-Canadian about that.
If you put a woman in
If you put a woman in prison for four years when she's young and make her pay her time in a horrible place and she wants to come out and work, and become a mother and be a contributor to society and pay taxes and you never give her that chance. There is something un-Canadian about that.
If you put a woman in
If you put a woman in
If you put a woman in
If you put a woman in
If you put a woman in
If you put a woman in

The quote by Kevin O’Leary addresses the rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals—specifically women—who have served time in prison. O’Leary emphasizes that after enduring a horrible place for several years, a person should have the opportunity to work, become a mother, and contribute to society by paying taxes. Denying these opportunities, he argues, contradicts the values Canadians pride themselves on, making the situation feel “un-Canadian.”

Its meaning lies in the tension between punishment and second chances. O’Leary suggests that the justice system should not merely focus on incarceration but also on the ability of former inmates to rebuild their lives. Without fair access to employment and social reintegration, the system risks perpetuating cycles of poverty, crime, and social exclusion—issues he implies run counter to the ideals of fairness and compassion that Canada aspires to uphold.

The origin of this statement can be traced to O’Leary’s public commentary on criminal justice reform in Canada. Known for his direct and often provocative style, he has used his platform to highlight what he perceives as systemic inefficiencies or moral shortcomings. In this case, the remark fits within broader debates about recidivism and the responsibilities of society toward rehabilitated offenders.

By calling such treatment “un-Canadian,” O’Leary invokes national identity as a moral yardstick. This rhetorical choice appeals to a shared sense of Canadian values, suggesting that denying someone the tools to start anew after they’ve “paid their debt” is not just unfair—it is inconsistent with the country’s self-image as inclusive, just, and humane.

Kevin O'Leary
Kevin O'Leary

Canadian - Businessman Born: July 9, 1954

Have 0 Comment If you put a woman in

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender
0.31394 sec| 2553.07 kb