If you look back today over the last 25 years, it is a fact that we have had a progressive degeneration of our intelligence community in general; in particular in the field of human intelligence.

If you look back today over
If you look back today over
If you look back today over the last 25 years, it is a fact that we have had a progressive degeneration of our intelligence community in general; in particular in the field of human intelligence.
If you look back today over
If you look back today over the last 25 years, it is a fact that we have had a progressive degeneration of our intelligence community in general; in particular in the field of human intelligence.
If you look back today over
If you look back today over the last 25 years, it is a fact that we have had a progressive degeneration of our intelligence community in general; in particular in the field of human intelligence.
If you look back today over
If you look back today over the last 25 years, it is a fact that we have had a progressive degeneration of our intelligence community in general; in particular in the field of human intelligence.
If you look back today over
If you look back today over the last 25 years, it is a fact that we have had a progressive degeneration of our intelligence community in general; in particular in the field of human intelligence.
If you look back today over
If you look back today over
If you look back today over
If you look back today over
If you look back today over
If you look back today over

In this quote, Paul Bremer is commenting on what he perceives as the decline of the intelligence community over the past 25 years, particularly in the field of human intelligence (often referred to as HUMINT). He suggests that rather than improving and evolving, the intelligence sector has suffered from a progressive degeneration, which implies a decline in its effectiveness or capabilities. Bremer’s statement reflects his concern that the ability of intelligence agencies to gather and analyze human intelligence, which involves working with informants and understanding human behavior, has weakened over time.

Bremer’s critique emphasizes the importance of human intelligence in the broader intelligence community. He points out that, while technical intelligence (such as signals intelligence or imagery intelligence) has advanced with technology, the more personal, nuanced field of human intelligence may have been neglected or deteriorated. This could suggest that there has been a shift away from more traditional, human-centered methods of gathering information, perhaps in favor of newer, technology-driven approaches.

The origin of this quote is likely rooted in Bremer’s extensive experience in the government and intelligence sectors, particularly his role as the Administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq after the 2003 invasion. His comments are informed by his insights into the functioning of the U.S. intelligence agencies, especially in the post-9/11 era, when there was a marked shift toward more advanced surveillance techniques and less emphasis on traditional intelligence-gathering methods.

Ultimately, Bremer’s statement is a cautionary note about the potential over-reliance on technological advancements in intelligence work, warning that the human element of intelligence—often the most critical and reliable source of information—should not be undervalued or overlooked. The quote underscores the need for balance between modern techniques and traditional practices in maintaining a robust and effective intelligence community.

Paul Bremer
Paul Bremer

American - Statesman Born: September 30, 1941

Have 0 Comment If you look back today over

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender
0.31810 sec| 2552.852 kb