I trained as a writer before I became a lawyer. I was headed for a life as an English professor, but that just wasn't me. I'm not a scholar; I didn't have a scholar's attitude toward literature.

I trained as a writer before
I trained as a writer before
I trained as a writer before I became a lawyer. I was headed for a life as an English professor, but that just wasn't me. I'm not a scholar; I didn't have a scholar's attitude toward literature.
I trained as a writer before
I trained as a writer before I became a lawyer. I was headed for a life as an English professor, but that just wasn't me. I'm not a scholar; I didn't have a scholar's attitude toward literature.
I trained as a writer before
I trained as a writer before I became a lawyer. I was headed for a life as an English professor, but that just wasn't me. I'm not a scholar; I didn't have a scholar's attitude toward literature.
I trained as a writer before
I trained as a writer before I became a lawyer. I was headed for a life as an English professor, but that just wasn't me. I'm not a scholar; I didn't have a scholar's attitude toward literature.
I trained as a writer before
I trained as a writer before I became a lawyer. I was headed for a life as an English professor, but that just wasn't me. I'm not a scholar; I didn't have a scholar's attitude toward literature.
I trained as a writer before
I trained as a writer before
I trained as a writer before
I trained as a writer before
I trained as a writer before
I trained as a writer before

The quote by Scott Turow—“I trained as a writer before I became a lawyer. I was headed for a life as an English professor, but that just wasn't me. I'm not a scholar; I didn't have a scholar's attitude toward literature”—reflects a personal crossroads between two very different professional identities. Turow acknowledges his early aspirations in academia, aiming to immerse himself in the world of literary analysis and teaching. However, he realized that his passion for storytelling didn't align with the intellectual detachment and analytical rigor often expected of a literary scholar.

Turow is widely known for combining his legal career with his literary talent, becoming a bestselling author of legal thrillers such as Presumed Innocent. This quote underscores the distinction he draws between the creative and the academic engagement with literature. While scholars dissect texts for structure, themes, and historical context, Turow felt more drawn to the act of creating stories, of crafting narratives that come alive through characters, tension, and emotion.

His statement “that just wasn’t me” speaks to a key moment of self-awareness—recognizing that the role of a professor or academic didn't align with his personality or ambitions. Rather than pursuing a career that felt like an ill fit, he redirected his path toward the law, which eventually became the foundation for his highly successful writing career. His understanding of legal complexities gave his novels authenticity and depth that set them apart.

Ultimately, the quote reveals how Turow found his true voice not in the study of literature, but in the intersection of law and storytelling. It is a reminder that discovering what we’re not suited for is just as valuable as finding what we are—and that embracing one’s authentic creative identity can lead to profound personal and professional fulfillment.

Scott Turow
Scott Turow

American - Novelist Born: April 12, 1949

Have 0 Comment I trained as a writer before

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender
0.34797 sec| 2552.844 kb