I do have a big problem with the idea of music as a form of communication unless it's political - and that's where it's tricky because a lot of music is political, even if it's not overtly so. But my music isn't that; it's about a feeling.

Julia Holter’s quote reflects her nuanced perspective on music as a form of communication. She expresses skepticism about viewing music purely as a tool for conveying specific messages, particularly in a political context. Holter suggests that while some music is undeniably political, even when not explicitly addressing political issues, her own work transcends such boundaries. Instead of using her music to communicate a direct message, she describes it as expressing a feeling—something more abstract and emotional.

Holter’s distinction between political and emotional music emphasizes the complexity of artistic expression. She acknowledges that music can be inherently political, whether by confronting social issues or by reflecting the political climate of its time. However, she clarifies that her focus is not on political themes, but rather on evoking emotions and creating an atmosphere that allows listeners to connect with her work on a more personal, sensory level.

The quote also touches on the broader idea of artistic intention and how different artists approach their craft. While some musicians use their work to advocate for change or to communicate ideologies, Holter’s approach is more about expressing complex emotions and creating a mood that resonates with her audience. This reflects a distinction between art that seeks to inform or persuade and art that seeks to evoke or explore feelings.

In essence, the origin of the quote lies in Holter’s belief that music can have multiple roles and meanings, and not all of it has to be explicitly political to be impactful. Her work centers around exploring the emotional and atmospheric power of music, offering an alternative way of thinking about how art communicates with its audience.