Home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names, and impossible loyalties!

In this quote, Matthew Arnold, a Victorian poet and cultural critic, reflects on the concept of a "home" as a place that shelters lost causes and forsaken beliefs. Arnold seems to be describing a space—whether literal or metaphorical—where unpopular ideas and impossible loyalties are preserved, even though they may no longer be recognized or accepted by the broader society. The term "home" here suggests a refuge or sanctuary for those things that have been abandoned or dismissed by mainstream thought.

Arnold’s reference to lost causes indicates a deep sense of nostalgia or resignation. A "lost cause" typically refers to something that, despite efforts, is no longer viable or likely to succeed. In this context, Arnold may be lamenting the decline of certain ideals or movements that were once important but have since faded. By linking this to the notion of home, Arnold evokes a sense of personal attachment to these beliefs, despite their unpopularity or failure to gain traction in society.

The phrase also touches on the idea of loyalties that may be seen as impossible or outdated. These could represent commitments to people, ideologies, or values that no longer align with the prevailing social or political norms. Arnold’s use of the word "impossible" suggests that such loyalties are not only rare but also impractical in the current context, yet he still holds space for them in the "home" he describes. This highlights his belief in the importance of maintaining integrity and faith in something greater, even when it seems impossible or out of step with the times.

Ultimately, Matthew Arnold’s quote portrays a home as a place for resilience and reflection, where ideas and values that no longer have a place in the wider world can still be cherished. It speaks to the human desire to hold onto beliefs and commitments, even when they are no longer valued or understood by the majority. The quote also reflects Arnold’s own experience as someone who valued intellectual and moral integrity, even in the face of societal change and pressure.