'Get along, go along' is not an inspirational philosophy, and only God knows how much moral cowardice it has covered up over the years. Serve your time, collect your chits, and cash 'em in for your home state? No, I'd say we could ask for more than that from our senators.

The quote, "'Get along, go along' is not an inspirational philosophy, and only God knows how much moral cowardice it has covered up over the years. Serve your time, collect your chits, and cash 'em in for your home state? No, I'd say we could ask for more than that from our senators," by Molly Ivins, critiques the political culture of complacency and self-interest. Ivins argues that the attitude of simply "getting along" in politics—doing the bare minimum and avoiding conflict—lacks inspiration and moral integrity. She suggests that this approach often masks moral cowardice, as politicians prioritize personal gain or convenience over making principled decisions for the greater good.

In this context, Ivins is calling for more from elected officials, particularly senators, than just serving their time and fulfilling the bare minimum responsibilities to their home states. The phrase "serve your time, collect your chits" refers to politicians who simply work to maintain power and accrue favors without pushing for meaningful change. Ivins contends that this is not a noble or inspirational approach to public service and that citizens should demand more courage, vision, and accountability from their leaders.

The origin of this quote comes from Ivins’ long career as a journalist and political commentator, known for her sharp wit and bold critiques of American politics. Ivins often used humor and satire to expose the flaws in the political system, particularly the self-serving nature of many politicians. Her commentary challenged the status quo, urging for a more principled and courageous approach to leadership and governance.

In essence, Ivins' quote serves as a call to action and integrity, encouraging people to demand more from their politicians. She stresses that moral courage, rather than political convenience, should guide decision-making in the public sphere, urging citizens to ask for leaders who are not afraid to stand up for what is right, even if it means going against the grain.