Cost overruns are not uncommon in architecture, particularly for designs that depart from structural or technological norms, or demand a finer quality of execution than commercial schemes - conditions typical of buildings for cultural institutions. Budgets are exceeded for many reasons, not all of them within an architect's control.

In this quote, Martin Filler reflects on the reality of cost overruns in architecture, particularly in projects that push beyond conventional design and construction standards. When a building departs from structural or technological norms, or requires an unusually high level of craftsmanship and execution quality, it becomes more susceptible to budgetary excess. These traits are often found in buildings designed for cultural institutions, such as museums, theaters, and libraries, where aesthetic and experiential impact takes precedence over economic efficiency.

Filler emphasizes that budget overruns in such ambitious projects are not necessarily the result of poor planning or incompetence. Instead, they are frequently the byproduct of artistic ambition, complexity, and innovative engineering—features that often lie at the heart of landmark architecture. These buildings aim to inspire, symbolize, and represent societal values, which often requires going beyond the limits of commercial design practices.

Another key point Filler makes is that the architect is not always solely responsible for the increased costs. Many factors beyond their control—such as client changes, regulatory challenges, material shortages, or unexpected site conditions—can contribute to escalating expenses. In such cases, holding the architect fully accountable overlooks the many collaborative and unpredictable dynamics that shape a building's final budget.

Ultimately, this quote serves as a reminder that visionary architecture often comes at a financial premium. While the public may fixate on cost overruns as failures, they can also be indicators of a commitment to design excellence, innovation, and cultural significance. Filler urges a more nuanced understanding of why some of the most iconic and admired buildings in the world come with higher-than-expected price tags.