But it's amazing how many people think that gay men should slink off into the shadows when it comes to having friendships with children.

But it's amazing how many people
But it's amazing how many people
But it's amazing how many people think that gay men should slink off into the shadows when it comes to having friendships with children.
But it's amazing how many people
But it's amazing how many people think that gay men should slink off into the shadows when it comes to having friendships with children.
But it's amazing how many people
But it's amazing how many people think that gay men should slink off into the shadows when it comes to having friendships with children.
But it's amazing how many people
But it's amazing how many people think that gay men should slink off into the shadows when it comes to having friendships with children.
But it's amazing how many people
But it's amazing how many people think that gay men should slink off into the shadows when it comes to having friendships with children.
But it's amazing how many people
But it's amazing how many people
But it's amazing how many people
But it's amazing how many people
But it's amazing how many people
But it's amazing how many people

In this quote, Armistead Maupin addresses the common misconception that gay men should be excluded from having meaningful friendships with children. He expresses his disbelief at how many people believe that being gay should somehow disqualify someone from forming close relationships with young people. The phrase "slink off into the shadows" suggests that society has historically attempted to push LGBTQ+ individuals into the background, denying them the opportunity to be fully engaged in family and community life.

Maupin’s words challenge the harmful stereotype that gay men are inherently unfit or inappropriate role models for children, which has often been perpetuated by societal prejudices. He points out that this assumption is not only unfounded but also harmful, as it denies gay men the chance to form loving and supportive relationships with children, just like anyone else. Maupin’s quote highlights the discrimination that still exists within some parts of society, despite growing acceptance and understanding of LGBTQ+ rights.

The word "amazing" here is used to convey Maupin’s shock at the persistence of these narrow-minded views, despite the significant progress made in the fight for LGBTQ+ equality. He finds it astonishing that such outdated and baseless beliefs about gay men persist, especially when they are capable of forming relationships based on mutual care and respect, just like anyone else.

Ultimately, Maupin’s quote is a call to reject these damaging assumptions and recognize that sexual orientation should not define one’s ability to form healthy and positive relationships, especially with children. He advocates for a society where everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation, has the opportunity to be fully engaged in the lives of others, particularly when it comes to providing guidance, support, and friendship to younger generations.

Armistead Maupin
Armistead Maupin

American - Novelist Born: May 13, 1944

Have 5 Comment But it's amazing how many people

GPNguyen Gia Phong

This feels like a call to confront our culture’s hidden biases. It’s shocking how such attitudes still quietly influence policy, parenting, and even friendships. What’s the root of this fear? Is it ignorance, or a refusal to see gay men as full, multidimensional human beings? I think it’s time for a deeper societal reckoning about how we define safety, morality, and community—and who we unfairly exclude from those definitions.

Reply.
Information sender

KKhanh

The quote raises a serious concern about how much damage these biases cause. How many gay men have missed out on mentoring, teaching, or being present in children's lives because of unfair suspicion? And what message does that send to LGBTQ+ youth? It’s not just discrimination—it’s erasure. How can media and education play a role in dismantling these false narratives and promoting trust based on real values?

Reply.
Information sender

TQHuy Tran Quang

This made me feel both angry and sad. It's awful that gay men still have to defend their capacity to be nurturing or trustworthy around kids. Why is heterosexuality seen as the default for moral decency? Shouldn’t we be judging adults based on their character and behavior rather than outdated fears? I’d love to hear from parents who are actively helping to break down these stigmas in their own families.

Reply.
Information sender

MHmai hoa

It’s heartbreaking that even now, people hold these kinds of views. Why are we still policing who is allowed to show care and friendship toward children based on their sexual orientation? This mindset says more about society’s biases than anything else. What can be done to challenge this stereotype at a community level—especially in schools, churches, and public discourse where these harmful ideas often persist silently?

Reply.
Information sender

Hhòang

This quote really exposes a deeply troubling prejudice that still lingers in parts of society. Why do some people automatically equate being gay with being unfit to be around children? It’s an irrational fear rooted in misinformation and stigma. I think we need to talk more openly about how harmful and dehumanizing these assumptions are—not just for LGBTQ+ individuals, but also for the kids who miss out on those valuable relationships.

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender
0.34304 sec| 2577.297 kb