After 1980, you never heard reference to space again. Surface, the most convincing evidence of the descent into materialism, became the focus of design. Space disappeared.

Arthur Erickson’s quote, "After 1980, you never heard reference to space again. Surface, the most convincing evidence of the descent into materialism, became the focus of design. Space disappeared," reflects his criticism of the shift in architectural and design priorities after the 1980s. Erickson highlights that, prior to this period, the concept of space—its use, experience, and significance—was central to design. However, after 1980, he suggests that the focus of design shifted toward surface and superficial elements, a shift that he associates with the rise of materialism.

By emphasizing the disappearance of space, Erickson laments that the more philosophical and experiential aspects of design were replaced by a focus on surface—the outward appearance and material qualities of objects and buildings. This change, according to him, represents a deeper cultural shift towards valuing tangible, consumable aesthetics over the intangible and thoughtful design of space that allows for interaction and depth. In this context, materialism refers to a culture that prioritizes material wealth and physical appearance, often at the cost of deeper, more meaningful experiences.

The origin of the quote lies in Erickson’s own architectural philosophy. Known for his humanist approach to architecture, Erickson believed that space should serve to enrich human experience, and that buildings and environments should be designed with a sense of meaning and purpose. His criticism of the increasing focus on surface reflects his concerns about the direction of modern architecture and design, where aesthetics and materials took precedence over the conceptual and spatial qualities of the environment.

This quote captures Erickson’s belief that the shift towards materialism in design was not just about a change in style, but about a fundamental change in how we perceive and value our surroundings. By equating the disappearance of space with the rise of materialism, he suggests that we lost something essential in our built environments—an emphasis on experience, reflection, and the true purpose of design.